Wooden Garden Shed- H200 x 142 x 239 cm/2.63 m2 - Outdoor garden shed with impregnated floor, 19 mm planks - TIMBELA M310+M310G

Quick assembly. On the other hand notice "postage stamp" not very readable. The shelter is functional. The thickness a bit thin, especially on the length with a little play despite the reinforcements. The roof can be improved (bituminous strip bof bof) The finishing strip of the you is not made to the right measure. And the door is not cut at the top. However at less than 900 € we have more than enough for the budget.

Simple to order. Fast delivery in two weeks as promised. Exceptional delivery person. Very polite and helping. Product not yet mount.

Poor quality, wood not thick enough, value for money not good, even if price not too high. . Upon receipt already veiled slats. Compared to models on display at major brands that I went to see to compare, the wood is really too light What about the assembly plan? illegible. finally mounted. But how long will it resist the weather conditions, very very pessimistic. Look elsewhere for this type of shelter.

I like the quality. It lacks a lock that I had to buy separately. The roof has a low slope for the rain.

The end result is very satisfying. We made a mistake: we took as a reference the maximum external measurements to make a 6cm concrete platform on which the house would be located, what the measurements of the reference of the house do not say is that the reference of maximum measurements correspond to the eaves of the roof, an aspect that has no influence on the realization of the concrete platform. It would be necessary to specify that for the realization of any platform or slab we must take as a reference the measurements that appear as interior. Another of the specifications that was not present and that surprised us: if you ask for the floor, the house is superimposed on top of the floor platform for which it would not have been necessary to make a floor, but to wedge the floor when the surface that the house receives is with some inclination as was our case. Our lack of experience in the assembly has not been a problem, the images are very clear, we would have appreciated if an order in the assembly sequence had been numbered that sometimes determined, for example: "Screw the front eaves first (the last final piece ) before the sides ", and avoid undoing what has already been done. The hardware does not correspond exactly to the image. The screws that are offered to fit the interior fittings, exceed with their length the thickness of the wood in which they must be fastened, so they end up penetrating the support surface and also screwing the door! We have two serrated edge floorboards left over that we have not been able to know where in the structure they should be placed ... Small instructions are needed that can explain a little beyond the intuition and the interpretation of the image. The final result has been contradictory: disappointment by the measurements have not been what we expected, since we took as a reference the maximum measurements that corresponded to the roof and not the interior, and aesthetically a feeling of great satisfaction for the final result.